New turing test for the creation of works of art

The Neukom Institute starts at Dartmouth College "Turing tests in Creativity": Can computers densitate or are people easy to swap?

The Turing test was so far as the non-plus ultra for the state of artificial intelligence. The Ki pioneer Alan Turing first suggested him in 1950 to develop such a bar for progress, from when to reach or simulated with Ki human thinking. However, it is in fact whether a Ki program can change people sufficiently to make them believe that with them speak a thinking person and no machine. Turing also spoke of an imitation game. The Prufling communicates in writing in natural language via a computer with a human and a machine. Can not he disassemble her or hold the Ki for a man, has the machine, D.H. The Ki program, the test passed. Whether it is already human, is another question. Especially when, as the tested test for the Loebner Prize show, people show themselves very easily.

Undoubtedly, KI systems are always "smarter" to become embedded with sensors and corps in the world robots and vehicles move autonomously. Ki programs meanwhile writing articles about sporting events, can chat with customers or perform operations. Dan Rockmore, Director of the Neukom Institute at Dartmouth College, now wants to transfer the Turing test on the field of art with a new competition, as he asked. The competition is oriented "Turing tests in Creativity" On the definition of art that you have something "with imagination and can create that is already or important ideas or feel". To be submitted to KI programs that can write a short story, a poem in the sonet shape or a DJ mix, of which people are convinced, they were not produced by a machine, but produced by a person.

After all, with this question, the cliff is avoided to judge if something is understood as art, what is excellent and incredibly arguing. It does not work about the quality, but only about it, whether, in such a way, the appearance of the "Work" So, as if it created a person or. that it is not one "soupless" or "faint" Machine can come from. The distinction is, of course, no less problematic, it concludes that what a human creatively creates, somehow had to be penetrated by this. You could ask yourself before, whether "the human" Expresses an artwork or an individual? And of course, in the art phare on the one hand, the genius and the subjectivity of the artist is summoned, at the same time methodical (RE) has always been produced and the subjectivity critically deconstructed, spat has been charged at least Duchamps "Objet Trouve" and constructivism a gear practice.

The Neukom Institute sets production conditions. For the poem (poetix) and the short story (Digilit) the program has 24 hours time to write something, "The theoretically in the New Yorker or in a Master of Fine Arts’s collecting tape". This is significantly less time than an average author needed to write something that is so high. The assessors will receive a collection of work in which computer-generated works and those come from emerging authors. But they should not be known to prevent them from being recognized by their style. The program for the short story should run on a normal computer with less than 8 gigabytes RAM, to enter a word immediately and a virtually unlimited amount of original short stories – with high probability -. Submissions must take the source code. For the DJ mix (Algorhythm), the Ki program has two hours to create a 15-minute stucco on the basis of a drop-down list of 1000 songs. Human DJs make the same under the same conditions. The stucco are played volunteers, which are then asked which are probably from machines.

Applications can be submitted to the 16. April 2016, so it’s still a long time. 5.000 US dollars will give it for every computer-generated submission, which is held by the jurors as a work of art created by a person. Rockmore does not believe that this will be possible in the case of the short story or the poem. But there will also be prices in high of 3000 US dollars for all submissions that show improvements in it, "How a computer deals with the idea of the creation, even if nobody is exchanged". Interestingly, not only the success, but also why it is not enough for a success yet.

Rockmore answers the question of how a computer program writing a love poem, if it never loved, there are more species to create art. For example, a program can analyze all sonnets that have ever been written to write a new poem from the rules and content. With a poem that is also easier, in a sonnet with the rhyme scheme and the rhythm more "Structure a priori" contain.

So you can do without any experience, only by creative combination and variation a love poem. The question of whether it comes from a person is irrelevant, Primar is the, whether it fails to humans, they attract, they are just exchanged if they believe it was written by another, a loving person written. Rockmore wants to make a market with his competition for moreover: "More and more people will keep the idea well that a machine produces things that we liked to give us pleasure, after which we are looking for in the high art or even in the community."

Maybe even more interesting when a program and no man creates a fascinating work of art. The secret and the depth of speculation, the artists, all in the near to artikeologists and fetishists, homing, had to be even deeper. Allzumen is much closer than the secret of algorithms.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: