Too high resolution, too little discretion

The exclusion of a camera generally applies as a qualitative feature. Even Mediterranean digital tunnels have now reached a level from which one can only dream with analog high-end cameras. Whether this is progress, this depends solely on the photomotive. For insect macros, high-ranked photos are, for example, a good thing. If you look like a hornet in the original just 25 mm long horny, you can inflate them in the enlargement easily to the desk descendant. Discovered when viewing the photo of the smallest details that you have never seen in normal viewing abandonments. Like the facet eye composed of numerous elements.

In the human photomotive, however, it is difficult with the high-rise photos: we have neither beautiful facet eyes, nor wrinkle-free chitin tops. Instead, we have hair there, where according to the walk of the shoreness ideal should be none, such as fluff on the ear or in other facial parts. Already newborns have the so-called baby spacious, and above all their mother suffering. The baby spacious disappears after a few days, then the Wonneproppen finally looks "normal". At the latest in the pubertat the fluff then comes again, man is unfortunately imperfect. At analog times was the little lousy no problem, so fine harchen could not map the film grain at all. It is not least thanks to the discrete film grain that Stars Fruher hovered purely visually in other sphars. Also, canvas hepotines like the young Audrey Hepburn had facial spacious, but that was not pixel-minded, finely detailed, blurred masked and 1: 1 zoomable for the posterity in the picture. Of these paradisiacal ratios, today’s celebrities can only dream. Every better digital camera works like a merciless enlargement glass and distracts the view, above all, on the inadmissibleities of the pictured (earful space). That the photographer smaps the portrayed inevitably as inevitable how unbelievably close to the fur technically hardly avoidable.

My tip: If you have a beautiful DSLR or system camera, you should photograph animals, architecture or my sake still life. You can hardly do something wrong with that. But please no human focal formatfullend. Unless you want to make someone purposefully, what can only be avoided by massive photoshop repairs. For advantageous portrays out-of-camera smartphones are now much better. You can do both: high resolutions with simultaneous smooth detail reproduction. This is progress that uses man.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: