Netzdg should “stay, but improved”

Netzdg should'bleiben, aber verbessert werden'

Graphic: TP

Individual member of the state members were able to engage

CSU politicians According to the controversial social media-censorship law NetDG adopted in the last legislative period from a rough coalition from Union and SPD, despite the resulting problems arising from their complete entry into force (cf. NETZDG: Short-term attention, long-term ventment) not abolished by a renewed coalition, but merely "evaluated" and attractive "crafted" will. That the CSU internal expert Stephan Mayer and the domestic regional group speaker Michael Frieser of the Image Newspaper.

Previously, the CSU Bundestag members and former Federal Minister of Hans-Peter Friedrich was committed to Twitter to vote for a request for the abolition of the law, which is currently being debated in the rates. When the law was passed last summer, with the CSU politician Iris Eberl had only a single Union administrator voted on. She held the former SPD faction leader Thomas Oppermann, not that in social media did not claim that he claimed "Law of hatred", but only "Opinions that you did not like".

Schulz hopes for network politicians from Union and FDP

Although only a single Member of the new black-red coalition negotiation, a single member of the new black-red coalition negotiation has signaled to vote for a network DG abolition, the FDP digitexperte Jimmy Schulz hopes for a surveillance majority for the application against the law, with the Social Democratic Federal Minister of Justice Heiko Maas to the Deputy FDP Chairman Wolfgang Kubicki "the rule of law" Has. In doing so, Schulz refers, among other things, that the resistance to the NetzDG is not only from the FDP, the industry links and NGOs, but also "of Cetz, the Network Political Association of the CDU and the club D64 related to the SPD".

The fact that many MPs of CDU, CSU and SPD will be voted for the abovement request is unlikely because it is in the yesterday’s 28-page probation paper of the three parties "In the Bundestag and in all committees charged by him, the coalition fractions are consistently different. This also applies to questions that are not the subject of the agreed policy." So you will try to enforce the faction discipline. At least as long as the new old coalition stop – so for the time being to the Bavarian state election in October.

Too possible voices from the ranks of the AfD says Schulz, he konn "which do not forbid to be against the law, even if the principle has a completely different attitude than we". The left brought a bill for a last year "Partial upholding of the network translation law" ON (see. Politics "punctuation"), but does not call for a complete abolition.

For the grunes containing the coordination of the NetzDG in the Bundestag, the Bundestag member Renate Kunast stimulated, the "obtained aspects of the law, such as domestic delivery agents, to concretize the transparency regulations and stricter specifications for preserving a complaint management" and over "Central, nationwide state specialized dishes" to "to discuss", the "for a faster and uniform case law". In blogs and social media you can see this project, among other things, because of the case-law of the informal specialized district court of Hamburg (cf. Hamburg Hort in Karlsruhe on) rather than call to the warrior repair of the NetzDG.

Action of Landtags administrator due to competence of the federal government?

If there is no excessive majority of the network against the Netzdg, Schulz has a catchy complaint for "conceivable", but "Eyberst difficult because a private person had to be affected and complaints". Dafur that politicians are potentially affected rather, not only the ambiguity is why a tweet or a post was lolled, but also a prominibonus, twitter politicians are allowed (cf. Twitter refers again to dealing with politician tweets).

The Leipzig Media Law Pressor Hubertus Gersdorf has pointed to a possible path to catching action: He recalls that media law in Germany is a primary random thing, which is why a parliamentary group or even a single member of the state of the state. However, no group has yet found that wants to go this path.

Also the AFD (which in the Bundestag sets a right-to-chance of the network of the Netzdg abolition) is so far back. Instead, their federal spokesman Jorg Meuten called on to send him and his team social media contribute to political opponents, "who probably ‘obviously unlawful’" and thus a case for the netDG are. He wants to go according to your own information "Beat Maas with his own weapons". Creating a quotocratic chest usable in electoral and debates was not explicitly called an explicit, but probably not undoubted side effect.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: